Ruto’s Gender-Based Violence Task Force Faces Legal Challenge in Court
President William Ruto’s recently formed task force on Gender-Based Violence (GBV) is now facing legal opposition, as four concerned petitioners have filed a case in court questioning its legality.
Back in January, President Ruto established a 42-member task force through Executive Order and Gazette Notice No. 109.
The aim of the task force was to address the growing crisis of Gender-Based Violence and femicide in Kenya, following increased pressure from civil society groups, human rights organizations, and members of the public demanding urgent action.
The task force includes several well-known individuals such as Ann Ireri, Sam Thenya, James Nombi, Michael Kariuki, Faith Odhiambo, Linda Musumba, and Seth Masese.
Other members listed are Gloria Wawira, Shem Nyakutu, Anthony Nzioki, Linah Kilimo, Norbert Talam, Edna Ngare, Lucy Njeri, Beatrice Karwitha, and many more.
The team was directed to report to Deputy President Kithure Kindiki and was given a 90-day deadline to conduct investigations, gather data, and deliver a detailed report on the state of GBV in the country. The goal was to provide solutions that would help reduce and prevent further cases of violence against women and girls.
However, months after its formation, the task force is now being challenged in court. The petitioners argue that President Ruto acted outside his constitutional powers by setting up the task force, claiming that it violates several sections of the 2010 Constitution of Kenya.
They insist that the creation of the task force was not only unnecessary but also unlawful.
In their petition, they pointed out that the work assigned to the task force already falls under the responsibilities of the National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC), which is a constitutionally established and independent body specifically mandated to handle gender-related issues.
According to the court documents, the petitioners argue that “matters relating to gender are clearly under the jurisdiction of the NGEC, not a task force appointed by the President or any other arm of the Executive.”
They say the existence of the task force undermines the authority and independence of the NGEC, and creates duplication of roles, which could lead to confusion and a waste of public resources.
The legal challenge now puts the future of the task force in question, with the court expected to determine whether its formation was in line with the Constitution or whether it breached the separation of powers between the Executive and independent commissions.
Join Our Political Forum official 2025 WhatsApp Channel To Stay Updated On time https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaWT5gSGufImU8R0DO30
