The National Assembly recently approved funds to renovate the official residence of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
However, this decision has raised eyebrows due to an ongoing impeachment motion against him.
The impeachment revolves around allegations of abuse of office and financial improprieties, including claims that public funds may have been misused during the renovation.
Gachagua’s legal team, led by senior lawyers including Elisha Ongoya, has been actively challenging the impeachment process.
They argue that proper public participation was not conducted, and the Deputy President was not given a fair hearing before the motion was tabled in the National Assembly.
His lawyers have also requested a constitutional bench to review the legality of the process.
This legal back-and-forth highlights the complexity of impeaching a high-ranking official like the Deputy President, as it raises important constitutional questions about due process and public engagement.
In essence, the situation points to political maneuvering, where Gachagua’s residence renovation has become a controversial point in his impeachment saga.
Some view the approval of renovation funds as a potential misuse of public resources, while others see the impeachment process as politically motivated.
The case will ultimately hinge on both legal arguments and political decisions within Parliament and the judiciary.