Kasmuel McOure found himself at the center of public outrage following his reaction to the attack on Morara Kebaso at the Bomas of Kenya.
Instead of addressing the violence against Morara, Kasmuel used his platform to push for the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
This move angered many Kenyans, who had expected him to stand in solidarity with Morara and condemn the incident.
Kasmuel’s response triggered a wave of online criticism, with many calling him a “sellout” and accusing him of aligning with political interests.
In a video posted on social media, Kasmuel fired back at his critics. He clarified that he was not present at the time of the attack on Morara and emphasized that he does not owe anyone an apology.
He boldly stated, “I am not sorry that I was at Bomas, and I do not in any way regret speaking at Bomas.” Kasmuel argued that the attack on Morara was not his responsibility and shifted much of the blame onto the public for enabling the violence by not showing up to support the event.
Kasmuel’s comments took a controversial turn when he accused the broader public of being responsible for the violence. According to him, the people who failed to attend the event were the real enablers of the attack on Morara.
He criticized those who supported the cause online but did not physically show up, claiming that they played a role in the violence by abandoning the event. “You are the biggest enabler of the people who meted out violence on Morara,” Kasmuel said, sparking even more backlash from Kenyans.
Kasmuel did not hold back from criticizing Morara Kebaso directly. He questioned Morara’s naivety in thinking that he could rely on an organic crowd to support him.
Kasmuel argued that political crowds need to be organized, and Morara failed to prepare adequately before addressing the crowd.
He said, “How do you walk into a place with a crowd that you have not mobilized?” This harsh critique of Morara’s approach added fuel to the fire, as many interpreted it as Kasmuel distancing himself from any responsibility for the chaos at Bomas.
Despite the criticism, Kasmuel defended his decision to focus on the call for Gachagua’s impeachment rather than addressing the violence.
He claimed that he was simply following the sentiments of the crowd and listening to what people on the ground were saying.
According to Kasmuel, the attendees were more interested in discussing political issues rather than the attack on Morara. “I listened to the ground, and I asked, ‘Is Gachagua going?’ and they said yes. Is Ruto going? They said, ‘Do not bring up Ruto here,’” Kasmuel explained in his video.
Kasmuel used the incident to emphasize an important lesson in politics: the importance of crowd mobilization.
He pointed out that political gatherings require organization and preparation, and organic crowds are rare in Kenyan politics.
This statement seemed to undermine Morara’s efforts, suggesting that he had failed to anticipate the dynamics of the crowd at Bomas.
Kasmuel’s critique of Morara’s planning further alienated his supporters, who felt he was deflecting responsibility for the violence that had occurred.
Kenyans took to social media to express their disappointment and anger at Kasmuel’s remarks. Many felt betrayed by his lack of solidarity with Morara and accused him of prioritizing political agendas over justice.
The criticism was particularly harsh among younger activists, who had previously seen Kasmuel as a voice for change. The backlash highlighted the growing frustration among Kenyans with leaders who fail to address violence and social injustices, fueling even more debates online about the responsibilities of public figures during such incidents.
The incident has deepened existing political tensions in Kenya, especially as many feel that politicians are increasingly out of touch with the needs of the people.
Kasmuel’s remarks have opened up discussions about the disconnect between the political elite and the public.
His failure to address the violence at Bomas is now being seen as a broader reflection of the indifference many leaders show toward the issues affecting ordinary Kenyans. This controversy has only added to the already volatile political atmosphere in the country.
Kasmuel McOure’s response to the attack on Morara Kebaso has sparked widespread outrage and raised important questions about political responsibility and accountability.
His refusal to apologize, coupled with his criticism of the public and Morara himself, has painted him as a divisive figure in Kenyan politics.
As the debate continues to unfold, it is clear that this incident will have lasting implications for Kasmuel’s political career and the broader landscape of public discourse in Kenya.
